Prolific Thought Regarding Human Civil Proceedings

I'm not going down for this one.
It's clear what has transpired, and why it has transpired.
I will not be held beyond my responsibility to act according to the normally acceptable and rationally sane manner in which I react to my surroundings.
I am not liable to be discredited by my action when that action is which is within a certain acceptibility when considering the specifics of my ability to react based on the social normalcy ratio, from deviant to just, from good to bad.


History is a complete record. It is not "African American" history or "Asian American" history, Muslim History, or any less than a complete record. What has transpired: History.

Evidence will suggest proof, and plausibility of proof will determine amplitude of truthfulness believed commonly.
Commonly.
Common History is a complete record comprised of the events determined to be accurately depicted by record of truthfulness believed commonly.

Collectively humans gain records and attribute those records with levels of merit as it is widely accepted and generally acknowledged. This is how we create a Historical reference.

It is this Historical divide, that between the Human creation of History, and actual History, which underlies many of the differences, in particular circumstances, such as Court proceedings, tribunals, etc, etc, etc. This is important when realized intangibly in the Political system, and Judicial System, as well as within Global communication.
Humans: We are a two party, three party, and endless infinite party. We are world entity, and we are in a collection.

What this means is that judgement needs to be passed with extreme care and most likely a single point of reference is going to prove insufficient for determining all pertinent factors in order to pass judgement upon situations where credibility is concerned.
Lawfulness and credibility.

Many irresponsible actions do occur, of course. However, we are failing to provide relief for cause in many cases, which is why the punitive system breeds failure, and not success, which are of course, contentious views, and at opposition, much of the time.

We will examine a way to devise proper basis for administering relief for adequately documented action which leads us to provide for the judged in the context of lawfulness and, or, credibility.

The more credible a source is and the more informed the inquisition is, the better the result of the economic distribution the provisions for the adjucated (individual or entity).